I just got the word that soon I’ll be working on a Joomla! based site, so I thought a little initial research might be good.
Part 1: The Joomla! homepage
8:36 Hmm…site looks nice. A little too shiny for my tastes, but professional, and I get a sense that the product is professional from the get-go.
8:37 Clicking on the Joomla! Logo link brings you to a very thourough explanation of not only the logo, and it’s meaning (it’s made up of 4 ‘J’s), but also proper use and copyright info as well.
There’s also a downloadable PDF of the logo brand manual. Wow.
The attention to detail, just about the logo, is outstanding. I think I’m starting to like these guys already.
9:00 The about page links to a cool developer’s profile page, which has pics of all the current developers, and bios. Nice touch.
9:06 Time to get down to business. The first FAQ is mighty interesting:
Is Joomla! a fork of Mambo? Some call it a fork. Some call it a spoon. Some call it an entire table setting. Whatever your philisophical persuasion, the facts are that Joomla is a continuation of the work of the Development Team which unanimously resigned from the Mambo project in August 2005.
9:07 It seems even the name Joomla has some meaning. From the FAQ’s
The name Joomla is a phonetic spelling for the Swahili word “Jumla”, which means “all together” or “as a whole”.
With all this meaning, and thoughtfullness put into the branding, I can only hope the product is as polished.
9:13 After a quick registration, I can browse around a demo version of Joomla free of charge.
Theres a lot to take in here. The admin panel has some obvious, and not so obvious features. One not-so-obvious feature is something called ‘Check In My Items’. Not sure what that pertains to. All in all the interface is fairly slick. A little heavy compared to something like Textpattern , but useful none the less.
I think it’s cool the way the admin stuff is worked into the design of the site (I think, it’s a little hard to tell), that way you can browse your site, while at the same time updating content. Having separate admin panels can be a pain. But I wonder how confusign it might be for novice users.
9:22 Hopping over to the extension repository for Joomla! I am just amazed at how many different plug-ins they have. From guestbooks, to shopping carts, to recipe plug-ins. It seems there’s more than enough extensions to work your site the way you want it.
9:26 Wow, over 100,000 forum members, and a whole host of useful-looking posts. Oooh, a link to a site with Joomla themes.
9:30 Well, it was interesting looking at all the different Joomla! themes available. Rigth off the bat they seem a little crowded with info. Most of them rely on a boxy-type layout. I wonder if this is native to the Joomla! CMS, or if that’s just the current style.
I have to say, even though it might be like comparing apples to oranges, the Wordpress themes I’ve seen are much nicer.
Conclusion
Well, all in all, it seems Joomla! might be a lot easier than I first thought. My fears though, are when we get to developing a custom theme for our client. I hope we’re not gonna end up with something horribly boxy.
Comments
Amy Stephen
Check out the wide-range of Joomla sites that have been constructed on JoomlaPlace.org.
All the best!
Rommert
I’ve got a lot of expierence with Joomla. All in all it’s a fine CMS for basic websites. Of course you’ve got tons of modules and components (and you could write your own, which is quite simple) but it lacks proper use of html elements in it’s current release (1.0.12). Since it’s been a developed from a duplicate system of Mambo 4.5.2 it lacks a lot of web semantics.
I’ve experimented a bit with Joomla 1.5 and it’s a leap forward but they still use a lot of tables to position things right. Semantics are a bit better i.e. standard use of lists instead of tables for menu items. Oh, and it has MooTools integrated within the core, which I think is a plus.
But as I said: it’s a fine CMS for the basic stuff and the templating engine is realy easy. You could create a joomla site from scratch within 5 hours.
My development CMS of choice is Drupal (Drupal.org). It’s got a bigger learning curve, but it’s more secure, lightweight and ideal for customisation, it’s got a lot of modules out-of-the-box and there’s a big community (Joomla’s probably bigger though), but Drupal is just more professional since it’s more of a CMS framework instead of a CMS.
Joomla is fine to start with, but after a while you’ll want more flexibility and yeah, you could hack your way through Joomla to make things right (did this with my last client who insisted on Joomla as CMS because he had some experience with it), but that will take to much time and it’s better to take a more flexible CMS.
Metadata
Posted
Friday, June 1, 2007
Category
Tools & Resources
Social Bookmarking
del.icio.us,
Newsvine,
StumbleUpon,
digg
